Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Luxury Footwear and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 15, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMissing Alt Text on ImagesKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Pop-up Content

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, a blind individual, has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online luxury footwear and accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 15, 2024.

The complaint alleges multiple WCAG violations, including inaccessible pop-ups due to poor labeling, product images mislabeled as links without alternative text, a lack of descriptive information for product color options, and improperly labeled product descriptions, pricing, and shopping cart details, which hinder keyboard navigation. The lawsuit further states that an 'accessibility' statement on the website was also inaccessible, indicating a failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher web accessibility standards.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses, particularly luxury retailers and e-commerce platforms, that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to costly litigation, injunctive relief, and demands for attorney's fees and operational changes to ensure equal access to goods and services.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this luxury footwear and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of inaccessible pop-ups due to poor labeling, product images mislabeled as links without alternative text, a lack of descriptive information for product color options, and improperly labeled product descriptions, pricing, and shopping cart details, which impact keyboard navigation. Additionally, an 'accessibility' statement was inaccessible.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar e-commerce businesses to face ADA Title III lawsuits if their websites are not compliant with WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards, particularly regarding screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation for visually disabled users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Luxury Footwear and Acces.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer