Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 26, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

WCAG 2.1 A/AAKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Link LabelsADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on July 26, 2024, against an online clothing retailer. The plaintiff, who is legally blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's mobile website is not fully accessible, preventing her from enjoying full and equal access to its goods, services, and facilities.

The complaint specifies several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include Guideline 2.1.1 (Keyboard) issues, where 'Continue Shopping' and 'add to cart' buttons on the checkout and homepage carousel pages do not receive focus or are announced by screen reader software. Additionally, Guideline 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context) is violated because multiple links, such as those on the homepage, the 'Cart' link, and the 'Search' link, are unlabeled or announced generically, making them unusable for visually impaired users. A lack of visible focus indicators further hinders navigation.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risk for any business operating an e-commerce website that fails to adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines for digital accessibility. Such non-compliance can lead to demands for injunctive relief, requiring extensive website modifications, and the payment of attorney's fees and litigation expenses to the plaintiff and their law firm, J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

The online clothing retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including Guideline 2.1.1 (Keyboard accessibility for buttons not receiving focus or being announced) and Guideline 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context for unlabeled links and lack of visible focus indicators).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for online businesses that fail to make their websites fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially resulting in lawsuits seeking injunctive relief and the recovery of attorney's fees and litigation costs under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer