Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant chain with an online ordering platform

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 29, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AALink Purpose (In Context) FailureKeyboard Operability FailureError Identification FailureADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA CASTRO has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a restaurant chain with an online ordering platform in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 29, 2024. The plaintiff alleges that the website of the online restaurant chain contains numerous accessibility barriers, preventing her from accessing and utilizing its services effectively due to her visual impairment. The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages, to ensure equal access for individuals with disabilities.

The complaint outlines several specific WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including failures in Link Purpose (In Context) where links for sign-in, sign-up, and creating an account do not adequately describe their purpose. Furthermore, widespread Keyboard Operability failures are alleged, impacting crucial functions like sign-up forms, login forms, menu navigation, store locator, viewing the bag, and checkout processes. The lawsuit also identifies multiple Error Identification issues, noting the absence of descriptive error messages for missing required fields during sign-up, login, password reset, search, and checkout transactions.

This legal action underscores the significant legal risk for businesses operating online platforms that serve as extensions of their physical locations. Companies in the food and beverage industry, or any sector with an online presence, must ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users, including those relying on screen readers and keyboard navigation. Non-compliance with established web accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1 Level AA, can lead to costly litigation, necessitating injunctive relief to remediate accessibility barriers, payment of damages, and recovery of attorney's fees.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant chain accused of?

The online platform is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A violations including failures in Link Purpose (2.4.4), where link purposes for sign-in/sign-up are unclear; Keyboard Operability (2.1.1), rendering many functionalities inoperable via keyboard; and Error Identification (3.3.1), due to a lack of error messages for missing required form fields during sign-up, login, search, and checkout processes.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by ARANTZA CASTRO, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for online businesses, particularly those with physical locations, if their digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to ADA Title III litigation, demands for injunctive relief, and financial penalties.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant chain with a.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer