Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Clinic

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 9, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAFocus Order ViolationMissing Labels/InstructionsImages of Text AccessibilityStatus Message Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on August 9, 2024, against an aesthetic plastic surgery clinic. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website is inaccessible to visually impaired users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

Specifically, the lawsuit details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include issues with Guideline 2.4.3 regarding Focus Order, where crucial dialogs are not announced to screen reader users; Guideline 3.3.2 concerning Labels or Instructions, as cart quantity is unclear; Guideline 1.4.5 for Images of Text, where promotional offers and size charts are not announced; and Guideline 4.1.3 for Status Messages, where 'Out of Stock' messages are not communicated, leading to navigation difficulties.

This action highlights the significant legal exposure for online businesses, particularly those in the health and aesthetic services industry, which fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating websites that serve as a public accommodation are at risk of similar litigation if they do not comply with ADA Title III requirements and WCAG standards, potentially leading to injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and litigation costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online aesthetic plastic surgery clinic accused of?

The clinic is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, specifically Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order), Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions), Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text for promotional offers and size charts), and Guideline 4.1.3 (Status Messages).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal risk for online businesses, especially those in health and aesthetic services, that do not ensure their websites are accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III. Non-compliance with WCAG standards can lead to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and litigation expenses.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer