Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 26, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC; Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AFocus Order FailureKeyboard Navigation FailureMeaningful Sequence IssuesBypass Blocks MissingNon-text Content Descriptions MissingLabels or Instructions MissingError Identification FailureADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA CASTRO, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online fashion retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on August 26, 2024. The lawsuit alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website contains numerous access barriers that prevent visually impaired individuals, including the plaintiff, from fully accessing and utilizing its services.

The complaint specifically details multiple WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including failures in focus order, keyboard operability, meaningful sequence, and bypass blocks. Additionally, it highlights issues with non-text content lacking descriptions, missing labels or instructions for user input, and inadequate error identification. These alleged barriers create a discriminatory shopping experience, preventing blind and visually disabled users from browsing merchandise, checking store hours, and making purchases.

This legal action underscores the critical importance for other businesses, particularly online fashion retailers and e-commerce platforms, to ensure their digital properties comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards. Failure to implement accessible design and provide auxiliary aids and services can lead to similar lawsuits, demanding injunctive relief to remediate website barriers, and exposing companies to claims for damages, attorney's fees, and costs for common law trespass.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

This online fashion retailer is accused of multiple WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including issues with focus order (2.4.3), keyboard operability (2.1.1), meaningful sequence (1.3.2), bypass blocks (2.4.1), non-text content (1.1.1), labels or instructions (3.3.2), and error identification (3.3.1).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA CASTRO filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC; Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for other online businesses, particularly those in the fashion retail sector, highlighting the need to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities under ADA Title III and WCAG standards to avoid similar litigation and potential liabilities for injunctive relief, damages, and legal fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer