Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Specialty Food Retailer

Case #FLMD-17113949 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Filed April 30, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextUnlabeled Form ControlsInaccessible NavigationInaccessible Search Function

Case Summary

Wanda Koehn, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., initiated a federal lawsuit against an online specialty food retailer on April 30, 2020. This action, filed in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, alleges violations under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The plaintiff, who is visually disabled, asserted that the digital platform associated with the retailer's brick-and-mortar stores presented significant barriers, hindering her ability to access essential services and information.

The complaint meticulously outlines several specific accessibility shortcomings experienced by Ms. Koehn while attempting to navigate the retailer's website using screen reader software. Key allegations include menu drop-down options and search functions that were not labeled to integrate properly with assistive technologies, thereby rendering them inaccessible. Furthermore, the site featured missing descriptions for image content and unlabeled buttons, posing substantial obstacles for visually impaired users. The absence of proper labeling for quantity options also impeded effective interaction, demonstrating a failure to meet widely accepted web accessibility standards.

This case underscores the increasing legal scrutiny faced by businesses operating online platforms, particularly those with a clear nexus to physical public accommodations. Companies that offer services, information, or merchandise via websites are at heightened risk of ADA Title III litigation if their digital presence fails to provide equal access for individuals with disabilities. Ensuring compliance with established accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.0 Level AA, is crucial not only for upholding legal obligations but also for fostering inclusive customer experiences and mitigating potential costly legal challenges.

Case Q&A

What specific digital impediments were identified on the online merchant's platform?

The plaintiff encountered various barriers, including menu drop-down and search functions lacking proper screen reader integration, absent descriptions for image content, and unlabeled interactive buttons, alongside unidentifiable quantity selection options.

Who is representing the plaintiff in this digital accessibility complaint?

Wanda Koehn is represented by legal counsel from Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and the Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What broader implications does this type of lawsuit hold for businesses with an online presence?

Such litigation highlights the imperative for businesses, especially those with physical locations augmented by digital platforms, to proactively ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments, thereby avoiding discrimination claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Specialty Food Ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer