Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online menswear retailer

Case #FLMD-17418097 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Filed August 5, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityAccessible Name and DescriptionKeyboard Operability

Case Summary

Plaintiff WANDA KOEHN initiated a federal lawsuit against an online apparel retailer, citing pervasive violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Filed on August 5, 2020, in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, the complaint details how the digital platform's design creates significant barriers for visually disabled users, hindering their ability to access information and services. Ms. Koehn, who experiences severe visual impairment, depends on screen reader technology for internet navigation, but found the retailer's website largely unusable.

The complaint specifically enumerates several critical accessibility shortcomings on the digital property. These included a mislabeled homepage link, a complete absence of descriptive text for essential image content, and a key site function, such as a shirt finder, that lacked proper labeling for screen reader integration. These technical deficiencies collectively prevented effective communication and equal access, falling short of established web accessibility guidelines, including WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards. The plaintiff also highlighted the difficulty in locating any accessible statement or policy regarding disability accommodation on the website itself.

This legal action serves as a crucial reminder for businesses operating online platforms, particularly those with an inherent nexus to physical retail locations, of their obligations under the ADA. Failure to proactively integrate comprehensive digital accessibility features risks not only litigation but also alienates potential customers with disabilities. Organizations must adopt rigorous accessibility policies, provide continuous employee training, and conduct regular, independent audits to ensure their digital assets are fully inclusive and compliant with federal disability law.

Case Q&A

What accessibility issues did the complaint identify on the retailer's digital platform?

The complaint alleged a mislabeled homepage link, missing descriptions for image content, and an unlabeled site function (e.g., a shirt finder) that failed to integrate with screen reader software, making the platform inaccessible for visually disabled users.

Who is the plaintiff in this ADA website accessibility case, and which law firm represents her?

The plaintiff is Wanda Koehn, and she is represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What broader legal principle does this lawsuit reinforce for online businesses?

This lawsuit emphasizes that online businesses, particularly those connected to physical stores, must ensure their websites provide full and equal enjoyment of services and information for individuals with disabilities, in compliance with Title III of the AD

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online menswear retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer