Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Footwear Retailer

Case #FLMD-17425637 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Filed August 7, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AA FailureMissing Alt TextMislabeled LinksScreen Reader IncompatibilityAccessible Names

Case Summary

Wanda Koehn, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ESQ., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., commenced a federal action in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, on August 7, 2020. The lawsuit targets an online footwear and accessories retailer, alleging its website contains substantial accessibility barriers that prevent visually disabled individuals from fully engaging with its services and information, constituting a violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint meticulously details several critical web accessibility failures. Specifically, the digital platform is accused of featuring mislabeled links and menu items, which hinder screen reader compatibility. Further issues include mislabeled descriptions for image content and inadequately labeled interactive elements like sliders, rendering them inaccessible to visually disabled users. These deficiencies collectively deny equal access to the retailer's online offerings, contrasting sharply with the experience of non-disabled users.

This legal challenge serves as a potent reminder of the ongoing accessibility obligations for businesses with an online presence, especially those that extend or support physical public accommodations. Retailers operating similar digital platforms should take heed; failure to proactively address and remediate web accessibility barriers can lead to significant legal exposure under ADA Title III, necessitating costly injunctive relief and demonstrating the critical importance of adhering to recognized accessibility standards.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility deficiencies were identified on the online retailer's website?

The website reportedly had mislabeled links, unlabeled menu items, inaccurate descriptions for image content, and interactive elements such as sliders that were not properly labeled for screen reader integration.

Who is the plaintiff in this lawsuit, and which law firms are representing her?

The plaintiff is Wanda Koehn, and she is being represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ES

, P.

, with co-counsel Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What potential legal ramifications could similar businesses face if their websites are not accessible?

Businesses with digital platforms that also serve as extensions of physical public accommodations risk ADA Title III lawsuits, which can result in orders for injunctive relief, requiring significant updates and ongoing monitoring to ensure web accessibility.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Footwear Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer