Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant group

Case #FLMD-63403039 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Filed June 22, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextImages of TextLogical Focus OrderAccessible NameName Role Value

Case Summary

Plaintiff James Watson, a legally blind Florida resident, has initiated an ADA Title III lawsuit against a restaurant group in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division. Filed on June 22, 2022, the complaint asserts that the defendant's mobile website is not sufficiently accessible to individuals with visual impairments. Mr. Watson, who relies on Apple Screen Reader VoiceOver software, contends that these digital barriers preclude him from fully engaging with the group's online services and information, thereby denying him equal access as mandated by law.

The legal document specifically enumerates several infractions of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA standards. These include deficiencies under Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content), where PDF menus contained unlabeled or improperly labeled images, and Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text), where textual content within images was not announced by screen readers. Further issues involved Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order), where the logical flow of content was disrupted, and Guideline 2.5.3 (Label In Name), evidenced by unlabeled icons in interactive forms. Additionally, Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) was violated, rendering the reservation system inaccessible to screen reader users.

This legal action serves as a crucial reminder of the ongoing accessibility obligations for businesses that offer services via digital platforms, even when integrating third-party vendors. The complaint underscores that the lack of accessible features—such as menus, reservation tools, and merchandise purchasing options—on mobile websites can lead to direct discrimination claims under the ADA. Organizations are thus compelled to prioritize comprehensive and continuous digital accessibility compliance to mitigate legal risks and ensure an inclusive online experience for all patrons.

Case Q&A

What were the specific accessibility deficiencies identified in the mobile website?

The mobile website failed to provide text alternatives for non-text content, contained images of text that were not comprehensible to screen readers, exhibited illogical focus order in menu content, had unlabeled icons in forms, and lacked proper Name, Role, Value attributes, rendering the reservation system inaccessible.

Who initiated the legal action and which firm is representing them?

The lawsuit was brought by James Watson, who is represented by the law office of J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What broader implications does this type of complaint have for digital service providers?

This complaint highlights the ongoing legal responsibility of entities operating digital platforms, even those relying on third-party services, to ensure full accessibility for individuals with disabilities, or face potential ADA Title III litigation and demands for injunctive relief.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant group. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer