Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Apparel Retailer

Case #FLMD-68160778 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Filed January 15, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: ZEIG LAW FIRM, LLC

Missing Alt TextKeyboard Operability IssuesSemantic Structure DeficienciesBroken LinksInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff SHAWN GETTINGER, a visually-impaired individual, initiated legal action against an online apparel retailer in the United States District Court, Middle District of Florida. This federal complaint, document number 1, was officially filed on January 15, 2024, alleging various digital accessibility failures that hindered his independent access to the retail platform.

The complaint specifically details numerous accessibility barriers preventing independent use by blind and visually-impaired users. These include a lack of text equivalents for non-text elements, the absence of title frames for identification and navigation, missing equivalent text when using scripts, and inadequate forms for sighted users. Crucially, content meaning and structure were not conveyed beyond visual presentation, text could not be resized without losing functionality, and time limits lacked user control. Further issues cited were web pages without descriptive titles, the inability to determine link purposes from text, the absence of a discernible keyboard focus indicator, and user interface elements whose name and role were not programmatically determinable. The plaintiff also encountered broken links where screen-readers failed to communicate the error, along with inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs).

Businesses operating digital platforms, particularly those with an e-commerce component, face significant legal exposure if their online presence fails to meet established accessibility guidelines. This case underscores the imperative for entities classified as public accommodations under Title III of the ADA to proactively implement comprehensive digital accessibility policies. Neglecting these standards risks not only litigation, but also alienates a substantial demographic of potential customers, resulting in reputational damage and the imposition of costly injunctive relief to remedy systemic failures.

Case Q&A

How did the website fail WCAG standards, according to the complaint?

The website allegedly failed in multiple areas, including missing alt-text for non-text elements, lack of descriptive title frames, absence of equivalent text for scripts, and forms that were not equally functional for visually-impaired users. Furthermore, it suffered from broken links and contained inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs).

Who is representing the visually-impaired plaintiff in this ADA Title III action?

Shawn Gettinger, the plaintiff, is being represented by the legal team at ZEIG LAW FIRM, LLC, in this federal lawsuit concerning digital accessibility.

What broader implications does this lawsuit hold for other online retailers?

This case signals to other online businesses that failing to adhere to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1) for their digital platforms can lead to significant legal challenges under the Americans with Disabilities Act, potentially resulting in mandatory overhauls of their website infrastructure and corporate accessibility policies.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Apparel Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer