Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Orlando-based aquarium

Case #FLMD-68262446 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Filed February 19, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextSemantic Markup ErrorsScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation Issues

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida on February 19, 2024. The complaint targets an organization operating an aquarium, alleging that its adjunct website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act due to significant digital accessibility barriers. Mr. Ariza, who is blind and visually disabled, asserts that these deficiencies prevent him from fully accessing critical information and services, which he intended to use for planning future visits and purchasing passes.

The complaint outlines several precise WCAG violations that impede navigation and comprehension for screen reader users. Specifically, it details the lack of proper descriptive text for navigational elements like "Previous" and "Next" buttons, which were merely identified as "Button" by screen readers. Other issues include improperly labeled text causing the cursor to bypass important information, inaccessible product pricing details hindering purchase decisions, and non-functional elements such as "Calendar Dates." These barriers collectively render the digital platform unusable for individuals relying on assistive technologies.

Such legal actions underscore the substantial risks faced by public accommodations that fail to maintain accessible online presences. Adherence to established guidelines, such as WCAG 2.0 Level AA, is crucial for businesses aiming to provide equitable access to all customers. Neglecting digital accessibility not only results in discriminatory practices but also exposes organizations to litigation, requiring court-ordered remedies and potentially significant financial and reputational costs associated with non-compliance.

Case Q&A

What specific digital accessibility issues were identified on the website?

The website was cited for several accessibility issues, including insufficient descriptions for navigation buttons (e.g., "Previous" and "Next"), improperly labeled text that caused screen readers to skip information, inaccessible product pricing details, and non-functional elements like "Calendar Dates."

Who is the visually impaired plaintiff in this accessibility lawsuit?

The plaintiff is Victor Ariza, and he is represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What broader implications do these alleged violations have for other businesses with online platforms?

These allegations highlight the ongoing legal obligation for businesses classified as public accommodations to ensure their websites and digital services are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, thereby preventing potential ADA Title III lawsuits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Orlando-based aquarium. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer