Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a university

Case #NY-69640185 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed February 13, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextMissing Link TextKeyboard NavigationDuplicate Page TitlesInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Leshawn Young has initiated a federal civil rights action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filing on February 13, 2025. This complaint targets an academic institution operating online, alleging that its digital presence fails to provide equal access for blind and visually-impaired individuals, thereby infringing upon their rights to public accommodations.

The plaintiff's complaint specifically outlines numerous deficiencies hindering accessible interaction with the university's online platform. These include critical issues such as the absence of alternative text for images and non-text elements, the presence of empty or redundant links, and linked images lacking descriptive alt-text, all of which impede screen reader functionality. Further accessibility barriers encompass pages sharing identical title elements, broken hyperlinks, inadequate keyboard operability with indiscernible focus indicators, and content where text cannot be resized without losing functionality. The complaint also highlights the lack of proper labels for user input fields, including CAPTCHAs, and structural markup errors that prevent assistive technologies from correctly interpreting content.

For entities maintaining an online presence, such detailed litigation underscores the critical necessity of adhering to established digital accessibility standards. Businesses in diverse sectors, particularly those offering services or goods through interactive websites, face substantial legal exposure if their platforms are not fully navigable by individuals relying on assistive technologies. The ongoing nature of these alleged violations serves as a potent reminder that proactive measures, beyond one-time fixes, are essential to ensure continuous compliance and to avert similar claims of discriminatory exclusion.

Case Q&A

What accessibility issues were identified on the online educational platform?

The platform exhibited several accessibility flaws, including a lack of alternative text for graphical elements, numerous empty and redundant links, and linked images missing descriptive alt-text. Additionally, it presented issues such as identical page titles, broken links, and poor keyboard operability with unclear focus indicators.

Which individual and law firm brought this federal lawsuit?

The lawsuit was filed by Leshawn Young, represented by the legal team at GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What broader implications does this case have for other digital service providers?

This action highlights a significant legal risk for any organization providing online services or goods that does not ensure its digital platforms are fully compliant with accessibility standards, particularly for visually-impaired users. It underscores the ongoing requirement for comprehensive and sustained accessibility efforts.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a university. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer