Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Crypto and Stock Trading Platform

Case #NY-69760097 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed March 20, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

Missing Alt TextEmpty LinksRedundant LinksInconsistent Page TitlesNon-Programmatically Determined UI Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff Cedric Bishop, who is visually-impaired and legally blind, has initiated a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of New York. The action, filed on March 20, 2025, alleges that an online crypto and stock trading platform operates a website that is not fully accessible to disabled individuals, specifically those relying on screen-reading software. Mr. Bishop contends that this inaccessibility constitutes a violation of his rights under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, alongside related New York State and City Human Rights Laws.

The complaint meticulously details a range of specific accessibility barriers encountered by Mr. Bishop while attempting to navigate the platform's digital interface. These alleged violations include a pervasive lack of alternative text for graphical elements, rendering visual content opaque to screen readers, as well as the presence of empty and redundant links that create significant navigational confusion. Furthermore, the plaintiff reported encountering linked images devoid of alt-text, identical title elements across multiple pages, and numerous broken links. These deficiencies collectively prevent visually-impaired users from fully engaging with the online services, including accessing pricing information or subscribing to trading platforms, directly hindering the equal enjoyment of the website's offerings.

This litigation underscores the ongoing legal imperative for digital platforms, particularly those engaged in commerce and service provision, to ensure their online presence is universally accessible. Businesses operating similar interactive websites face substantial legal exposure if they neglect to implement robust digital accessibility standards, such as those outlined in WCAG 2.0. The failure to address such barriers not only risks legal action but also alienates a significant segment of the consumer population, emphasizing that ongoing commitment to accessibility, rather than one-time fixes, is critical for sustained compliance and market inclusion.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility challenges did the plaintiff encounter with the trading platform's website?

The plaintiff experienced several significant accessibility issues, including the absence of alternative text for images, empty and redundant links, linked images missing alt-text, inconsistent page titles across different sections, and numerous broken links that impeded navigation.

Who is the plaintiff in this case, and which law firm represents them?

The plaintiff is Cedric Bishop, a visually-impaired and legally blind individual. He is represented by Gottlieb & Associates PLLC.

What broader implications does this lawsuit carry for other online businesses?

This case highlights the continuous legal obligation for digital service providers to maintain accessible websites under the Americans with Disabilities Act. It signals that businesses failing to adopt and sustain WCAG-compliant practices risk similar litigation, emphasizing the need for proactive and comprehensive accessibility strategies.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Crypto and Stoc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer