Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a national non-profit organization

Case #NY-69839715 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed April 3, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.

Missing Alt TextKeyboard AccessibilityScreen Reader IncompatibilityUnlabeled ElementsWCAG 2.1 AA

Case Summary

Jovan Campbell, a legally blind individual, has initiated legal proceedings against a prominent national non-profit organization. This civil rights action, alleging violations of ADA Title III and New York state laws, was filed on April 3, 2025, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, contending that the organization’s online platforms are inaccessible to visually-impaired users.

The complaint meticulously details numerous accessibility barriers preventing screen-reader users from engaging with the online platforms. Specific allegations include a significant lack of alternative text descriptions for graphical elements, rendering images incomprehensible. Further issues involve inaccessible drop-down menus, absent or confusing navigation links, insufficient prompting and labeling on interactive forms, and a complete denial of keyboard-only access essential for navigation. Additionally, empty and redundant links, along with features requiring exclusive mouse interaction, fundamentally impede independent use, particularly noted in the inability to access cookie details, quantity fields, and checkout processes.

This lawsuit highlights the escalating legal scrutiny faced by entities operating digital platforms that fail to adhere to established accessibility guidelines. Organizations offering goods and services online, especially those categorized as public accommodations, are increasingly at risk of litigation under federal and state disability laws if their digital interfaces remain inaccessible. Ensuring comprehensive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance is therefore paramount not only to foster inclusivity but also to mitigate substantial legal and reputational exposure in the evolving digital marketplace.

Case Q&A

Which specific digital accessibility barriers did the plaintiff encounter on the online platforms?

The plaintiff experienced issues such as missing alternative text for graphics, inaccessible drop-down menus, insufficient navigation links, unlabeled form fields, and a general lack of keyboard accessibility, making independent transactions impossible.

Who is the individual bringing this lawsuit, and which law firm is representing her?

Jovan Campbell is the plaintiff in this case, and she is represented by the legal team at Shaked Law Group, P.C.

What broader legal implications does this complaint carry for other businesses with online presences?

This action underscores the critical need for all businesses operating digital platforms to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, thereby avoiding potential litigation under ADA Title III and state-specific human rights laws.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a national non-profit org.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer