Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online tea and botanical retailer

Case #NY-70539060 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed June 14, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

Missing Alt TextEmpty LinksRedundant LinksDuplicate Page TitlesBroken Links

Case Summary

Plaintiff Mykayla Fagnani, a legally blind individual, has initiated a federal civil rights action against an online tea and botanical retailer. This lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, on June 14, 2025, asserts that the retailer’s digital platform fails to comply with federal and state accessibility mandates, denying visually-impaired users full and equal access to its online goods and services.

The complaint specifically details several critical accessibility barriers encountered by Fagnani. These include a complete lack of alternative text for graphical images, making visual content incomprehensible to screen readers, and empty links devoid of descriptive text, leading to user confusion. Additionally, the website featured redundant links directing to identical URLs, creating unnecessary navigation repetition, and linked images missing vital alt-text. Further issues cited involve pages with identical title elements, which prevent screen readers from distinguishing between different sections, and numerous broken links that led to inaccessible error pages without proper communication from the screen-reading software.

This action underscores the ongoing legal challenges faced by digital businesses that neglect inclusive design principles. Online platforms that offer goods and services, particularly those engaging in e-commerce, must proactively address their digital accessibility to avoid similar litigation under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The lack of adherence to established standards, such as WCAG 2.0, exposes companies to significant legal and reputational risks, highlighting the imperative for comprehensive and continuous accessibility audits and remediation efforts across their entire digital presence.

Case Q&A

What accessibility failures were identified on the online merchant's platform?

The plaintiff reported encountering multiple access barriers, including missing alternative text for images and linked images, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links, pages with identical title elements, and broken links that failed to communicate their status to screen-reading software.

Who is bringing this complaint and which law firm is representing them?

Mykayla Fagnani is the plaintiff in this class action. She is represented by Gottlieb & Associates PLLC.

What broader implications does this lawsuit have for businesses operating online?

This case highlights the legal obligation for online businesses to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, in compliance with ADA Title III and related state laws. Failure to implement accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0, can result in lawsuits seeking injunctive relief and damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online tea and botanic.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer