Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online health supplement retailer

Case #NY-71023503 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed August 4, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

Missing Alt TextEmpty LinksRedundant LinksMissing Unique Page TitlesBroken Links

Case Summary

Plaintiff JUDITH ADELA FERNANDEZ MARTINEZ initiated legal proceedings against an online health supplement retailer in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit, filed on August 4, 2025, alleges severe violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III, as well as New York State and City Human Rights Laws, stemming from the defendant organization's inaccessible digital platform.

The complaint meticulously details numerous accessibility barriers encountered by Ms. Martinez, who relies on screen-reading software. Key violations include missing alternative text for images and captcha prompts, empty links devoid of descriptive text, redundant links leading to the same URL, and linked images lacking proper alt-text, which collectively impede screen readers. Further issues cited involve identical page titles across multiple web pages, preventing distinction, and broken links that fail to communicate their inoperability to visually impaired users, creating significant navigation challenges.

This legal action underscores a persistent and evolving challenge for businesses operating online: ensuring digital inclusivity. Companies failing to adhere to established web accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.0, face substantial legal exposure and risk alienating a significant demographic of potential customers. The case serves as a stark reminder that maintaining an accessible website is not merely a technical task but an ongoing commitment to corporate policy and user experience, with non-compliance leading to claims of intentional discrimination and demands for comprehensive injunctive relief.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility shortcomings were identified on the online platform?

The plaintiff encountered multiple barriers, including a complete absence of alternative text for graphical elements and captcha prompts, the presence of empty links without descriptive text, redundant hyperlinks, and linked images that lacked proper alt-text. Additionally, several pages shared identical title elements, making navigation confusing for screen reader users, and broken links provided no feedback about their non-functionality.

Who filed the lawsuit and which legal representative is handling the case?

JUDITH ADELA FERNANDEZ MARTINEZ, a visually-impaired individual, filed the lawsuit. She is represented by the law firm GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What broader implications does this case hold for digital businesses regarding accessibility?

This litigation highlights the critical need for online businesses to proactively design and maintain their digital properties in compliance with accessibility standards like WCAG 2.0. Failure to do so not only risks similar legal challenges under the ADA and state laws but also results in the exclusion of disabled users, potentially leading to significant financial and reputational costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online health suppleme.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer