Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Cosmetics Retailer

Case #NY-71348510 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed September 15, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0Missing Alt TextKeyboard AccessibilityNon-descriptive LinksInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez, representing herself and other visually-impaired individuals, initiated a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 15, 2025. This legal challenge targets an online cosmetics retailer, asserting that its interactive digital platform fails to provide equitable access to its goods and services for blind and low-vision users, thus violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III, alongside New York State and City human rights laws.

The complaint meticulously details a range of alleged WCAG violations, including a pervasive lack of alternative text for graphical elements and images embedded in links, rendering visual content incomprehensible to screen readers. Further accessibility impediments encompass the absence of descriptive page titles, preventing distinct identification of various sections; non-descriptive links whose purpose cannot be determined from text alone; and forms that do not offer the same functionality or information as for sighted users. The digital storefront is also cited for issues with keyboard operability, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDF) files, and a failure to programmatically determine the default human language of web pages, all of which obstruct independent navigation and interaction.

This action serves as a crucial reminder for all digital commerce platforms that operate online. Companies that maintain websites offering consumer goods and services face significant legal exposure if their platforms are not designed to be fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Ensuring compliance with established accessibility guidelines like WCAG 2.0 is paramount, as an inability to independently access online content not only infringes upon civil rights but also deters a substantial demographic of potential customers, resulting in considerable legal and reputational repercussions.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility deficiencies were cited on the website?

The complaint highlights numerous issues, including missing alternative text for images, non-descriptive links and page titles, forms without equivalent information for screen readers, and problematic keyboard operability for navigation, alongside inaccessible PDF documents.

Who is bringing this legal action and which firm represents them?

The plaintiff, Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez, has filed this lawsuit on behalf of herself and a class of visually-impaired individuals, with legal representation provided by GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What are the broader implications for businesses with similar online operations?

This case underscores the ongoing legal risk for any online business that fails to ensure its digital properties are fully accessible to persons with disabilities, potentially leading to similar lawsuits under federal and state accessibility laws.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Cosmetics Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer