Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Skincare Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed February 10, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Focus Indication FailureBroken & Empty LinksInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Cedric Bishop, a visually-impaired individual, has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online skincare retailer in the Southern District of New York on February 10, 2026. The lawsuit alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind and visually-impaired users, preventing them from fully accessing goods and services such as product information, pricing, and purchasing options.

The complaint details numerous accessibility barriers, including the lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, empty and redundant links, issues where information is conveyed only visually, text not resizable, enforced time limits, web pages lacking descriptive titles, unclear link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, programmatic language determination failures, unexpected context changes, missing labels for user input (including CAPTCHAs), malformed markup, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDF) files. These violations are alleged to prevent screen-reading software from effectively interpreting the website's content, denying equal access.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for any business operating an online platform that falls under the definition of a public accommodation by the ADA Title III. Companies failing to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, especially those relying on screen readers, face potential lawsuits seeking permanent injunctions to correct deficiencies, compensatory damages, and attorneys' fees to remedy discriminatory practices and ensure digital inclusivity.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online skincare retailer accused of?

The online skincare retailer is accused of lacking alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, having empty and redundant links, conveying information solely through visual means, text that cannot be resized, enforced time limits, web pages without descriptive titles, unclear link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Cedric Bishop, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated persons, filed this lawsuit. They are represented by Gottlieb & Associates PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit indicates a significant legal risk for businesses operating online platforms that are not compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Such entities may face litigation demanding site remediation, policy modifications, and financial penalties for denying equal digital access to individuals with disabilities.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Skincare Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer