Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online formalwear retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed February 10, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: JOSEPH & NORINSBERG, LLC

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text on Product ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureInaccessible Carousels

Case Summary

Plaintiff Beth Kramer filed a class action lawsuit on February 10, 2026, in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against an online formalwear retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind and visually impaired users who rely on screen-reading software like NVDA, denying them equal access to its products and services.

The lawsuit identifies numerous Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including missing or placeholder alternative text on product images, ARIA-hidden elements containing focusable content causing screen readers to announce silence, and buttons, links, and controls lacking accessible names. Other barriers include nested interactive elements preventing screen readers from announcing roles and states, inaccessible product carousels, CSS positioning issues causing reading order divergence, autoplaying media without pause controls, and pricing information not programmatically conveyed. A SortSite audit further confirmed systemic issues across over 1,000 pages, highlighting unlabeled links and form controls, missing headings, and promotional banners that were inaccessible.

This action underscores the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating digital platforms that fail to implement comprehensive accessibility measures. Companies with e-commerce websites must ensure their sites are fully perceivable and navigable by individuals with disabilities to avoid potential litigation under ADA Title III and similar state laws, highlighting the necessity for adherence to WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online formalwear retailer accused of?

The online formalwear retailer is accused of numerous violations including missing or placeholder alt text on product images, ARIA-hidden elements containing focusable content that caused screen readers to announce silence, buttons, links, and controls lacking accessible names, and inaccessible product carousels. Other issues include CSS positioning that breaks reading order, autoplaying media without pause controls, and pricing information not programmatically conveyed.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Beth Kramer filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm JOSEPH & NORINSBERG, LLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for businesses with e-commerce websites that do not comply with digital accessibility standards, particularly WCAG 2.1 Level A

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online formalwear reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer