Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed March 4, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

Missing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureBroken LinksWCAG 2.0 Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff LESHAWN YOUNG, representing herself and a proposed class, has initiated a federal lawsuit against an online apparel and accessories retailer in the Southern District of New York, filed on March 4, 2026. This civil rights action alleges that the interactive website operated by the defendant fails to provide visually-impaired and legally blind individuals with full and equal access to its goods and services, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint outlines numerous Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0) violations, including the absence of alternative text for graphical images, which impedes screen readers from vocalizing content descriptions. Other issues include empty links lacking text descriptions, creating confusion for keyboard and screen-reader users; redundant links that direct to the same URL, causing repetitive navigation; and linked images missing alt-text, leaving screen readers without functional context. Furthermore, the e-commerce website featured multiple pages with identical title elements, preventing screen readers from distinguishing between them, and contained broken links that offered no communication about their non-existent status.

This legal action underscores the significant compliance obligations for digital businesses, emphasizing the imperative to ensure their online platforms are fully accessible to and independently usable by individuals with disabilities. Companies operating similar e-commerce websites face substantial legal exposure, including potential injunctions, compensatory damages, and attorneys' fees, if their digital offerings do not meet ADA Title III and WCAG standards.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The online apparel and accessories retailer is accused of several WCAG 2.0 violations, including missing alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, empty links, redundant links, pages with identical title elements, and broken links.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by LESHAWN YOUNG, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, and is represented by GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for online businesses that fail to provide accessible websites for disabled users, potentially leading to ADA Title III litigation, demands for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorneys' fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel and acc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer