Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online apparel retailer

Case #NY-73720645 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed August 5, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

Missing Alt TextKeyboard OperabilityPage Title UniquenessDescriptive Link TextAccessible Forms and Labels

Case Summary

Leshawn Young, a visually-impaired individual represented by Gottlieb & Associates PLLC, has initiated a federal civil rights action against an online apparel retailer. Filed on August 5, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the complaint alleges that the defendant's interactive website fails to provide equal access to blind and visually-impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as well as New York State and City human rights laws.

The complaint details numerous and specific WCAG violations that impede independent navigation and interaction for screen reader users. Allegations include the critical absence of alternative text for graphical elements, empty links lacking descriptive text, and redundant links that create navigational confusion. Further accessibility shortfalls comprise the lack of unique page titles for different web pages, broken links that redirect users without proper screen reader communication, and forms that do not offer the same functionality to visually-impaired users. Issues also extend to the inability to programmatically determine UI element names and roles, and the non-provision of equivalent text when scripts are utilized.

This legal challenge underscores the ongoing imperative for online businesses, particularly those operating interactive e-commerce platforms, to prioritize digital accessibility. Such lawsuits highlight the substantial legal and reputational risks associated with non-compliance with ADA Title III and related state statutes, compelling companies to proactively audit and remediate their digital assets to ensure universal access for all users, including those relying on assistive technologies like screen readers. The failure to do so can result in significant injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and a forced overhaul of digital policies and practices.

Case Q&A

What types of accessibility barriers were reported on the online retailer's website?

The website presented numerous barriers, including missing alternative text for images, empty and redundant links, non-unique page titles, broken links, and forms that lacked accessible functionality for screen reader users.

Who is the plaintiff and which law firm is representing her in this action?

The plaintiff is Leshawn Young, a visually-impaired individual. She is represented by Gottlieb & Associates PLLC.

What broader implications does this lawsuit have for other businesses with online platforms?

This case signals that businesses operating websites must adhere to digital accessibility standards, such as WCAG, to avoid legal action under the ADA and similar state laws. Failure to ensure inclusive access can lead to injunctions, financial penalties, and mandated overhauls of digital infrastructure.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online apparel retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer