Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Lip Balm Retailer

Case #NY-74736221 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed September 1, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Focus IndicatorInaccessible FormsNon-Descriptive Page TitlesBroken Links

Case Summary

In the Southern District of New York, plaintiff WASHINGTON BENAVIDES MORAN initiated a civil rights action on September 1, 2026, against an online lip balm retailer. The lawsuit alleges that the defendant organization's interactive website fails to provide full and equal access to blind and visually-impaired individuals, thereby violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and related state and local statutes. Mr. Moran, who relies on screen-reading software, seeks injunctive relief to compel the defendant to remediate its digital platform and ensure accessibility for all users.

The complaint meticulously details a series of critical accessibility barriers encountered by the plaintiff. These include a pervasive lack of alternative text for graphical images, making visual content indecipherable to screen readers. Further issues involve empty links devoid of descriptive text, redundant links that complicate navigation, and linked images missing essential alt-text. The website also suffers from non-descriptive page titles, which hinder user orientation, and contains broken links that redirect users to error pages without proper notification through assistive technology, creating significant frustration and preventing independent access to products and services.

Businesses operating interactive online platforms, particularly those engaged in e-commerce, face substantial legal exposure if their digital properties do not adhere to established accessibility guidelines. This litigation underscores the necessity for comprehensive digital accessibility strategies, encompassing not only initial design but also ongoing maintenance and user testing. Failure to integrate robust accessibility features can lead to similar civil rights challenges, costly litigation, and a denial of access to a significant segment of the consumer market, highlighting the urgent need for proactive compliance to avoid discriminatory practices.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility barriers did users encounter on the challenged website?

Users encountered numerous barriers, including a lack of alternative text for images, empty and redundant links, non-descriptive page titles, and broken links that were not properly communicated by screen readers.

Who is representing the plaintiff in this digital accessibility claim?

The plaintiff, WASHINGTON BENAVIDES MORAN, is represented by the legal team at GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What broader implications does this lawsuit have for online retailers?

This case highlights that online retailers must ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities to comply with ADA Title III and similar laws, warning against the legal and reputational risks of neglecting digital accessibility.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Lip Balm Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer