Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online coffee retailer

Case #NY-74829648 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed September 22, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextEmpty LinksDescriptive Page TitlesKeyboard Focus IndicatorBroken Links

Case Summary

Judith Adela Lopez, an individual with a visual impairment, initiated legal proceedings against an online coffee retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit, filed on September 22, 2026, alleges that the defendant organization's interactive website fails to provide equal access for blind and visually-impaired users, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, alongside state and city human rights laws. Plaintiff seeks both declaratory and injunctive relief to compel the digital platform to comply with established accessibility standards.

The complaint meticulously details a series of specific accessibility barriers encountered by screen reader users. Key violations include the pervasive lack of alternative text descriptions for graphical elements and linked images, rendering visual content inaccessible. Further challenges arose from empty links that lacked descriptive text, redundant navigation links that created unnecessary repetition, and numerous web pages sharing identical title elements, making differentiation difficult. The platform also reportedly failed to provide proper labels or instructions for user input, did not allow for text resizing up to 200%, and contained broken links that trapped users without adequate notification of the error.

This legal action underscores the critical importance for all businesses operating in the digital sphere to prioritize website accessibility. Companies offering goods and services online must ensure their platforms are fully navigable and usable for individuals with disabilities, or they risk facing similar litigation. Adhering to recognized standards such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) is not merely a legal obligation but also an essential practice for fostering inclusivity and expanding market reach to all potential customers.

Case Q&A

What specific digital accessibility shortcomings were identified in the online platform?

The complaint outlines several critical failures, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, the presence of empty and redundant navigation links, and the use of identical page titles across multiple sections. Additionally, users faced issues with non-resizable text, unidentified link purposes, and broken links.

Who initiated this lawsuit, and which legal counsel is representing the claimant?

This complaint was filed by Judith Adela Lopez, a visually impaired individual. She is represented by Gottlieb & Associates PLLC, the law firm noted in the court document.

What broader implications does this type of lawsuit hold for digital businesses?

This litigation highlights the significant legal risks, including potential injunctions and damages, for any online business that fails to make its website accessible to individuals with disabilities. It reinforces the necessity of proactive compliance with digital accessibility standards to avoid violating civil rights laws.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online coffee retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer