Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online skincare retailer

Case #NYED-26425341 · District Court, E.D. New York · Filed December 29, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard NavigationForm LabelingScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Mary Conner, a visually-impaired individual, initiated legal proceedings against a company operating an online retail platform. This action, filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York on December 29, 2020, alleges significant digital accessibility failures under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Represented by Shaked Law Group, P.C., Ms. Conner seeks to ensure equal access for blind and visually-impaired individuals to the defendant's commercial website.

The complaint outlines numerous accessibility barriers that impede independent navigation and transaction completion. Specifically, the plaintiff encountered a lack of alternative text on graphics, rendering images indecipherable to screen readers. Inaccessible drop-down menus, missing navigation links, inadequate prompting and labeling, and the absence of keyboard access further compounded the usability issues. An overlay widget, intended to enhance accessibility, was found to be ineffective and misleading, failing to announce crucial information or provide proper focus for screen reader users, particularly during the checkout process where cart confirmations and subscription options were inaccessible.

This litigation underscores the critical need for online businesses to adhere to established accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.1. Companies failing to implement foundational accessible design elements, like comprehensive alt-text, keyboard navigability, and proper form labeling, risk facing similar legal challenges. Ensuring digital platforms are independently usable by persons with disabilities is not merely a legal obligation but also expands market reach, preventing exclusion from the rapidly growing internet economy for a significant demographic.

Case Q&A

What specific digital accessibility shortcomings were identified on the online platform?

The platform exhibited a range of accessibility problems, including the absence of alternative text for graphics, dysfunctional overlay widgets that failed to provide effective screen reader support, inaccessible drop-down menus, and a general lack of keyboard operability, preventing blind users from completing purchases.

Who filed the legal action and which law firm is representing the plaintiff?

The lawsuit was filed by Mary Conner, and she is represented by SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.

What broader implications does this case have for other online businesses?

This case highlights the ongoing legal imperative for all businesses with online presences to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, mitigating the risk of ADA Title III litigation and promoting equitable digital inclusion.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online skincare retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer