Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Non-Profit Organization's Digital Store

Case #NYED-69669696 · District Court, E.D. New York · Filed February 25, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.

Missing Alt TextKeyboard AccessibilityForm Field LabelsNavigation AccessibilityInaccessible Drop-Down Menus

Case Summary

Plaintiff Rasheta Bunting, represented by SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C., initiated this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on February 25, 2025. This legal challenge targets a prominent non-profit organization operating a digital cookie sales platform, alleging that its online store presents significant accessibility barriers for visually impaired users. The complaint asserts that these digital impediments prevent blind individuals from fully and equally participating in the organization's online services, including browsing products and making purchases, thereby denying them equal access compared to sighted customers.

The complaint meticulously details several critical WCAG violations hindering access for screen reader users. Specifically, the digital store allegedly suffers from a pervasive lack of alternative text on graphics, making images, nutritional information, and cookie details inaccessible. Further issues include inaccessible drop-down menus, an absence of clear navigation links, inadequate prompting and labeling for forms, and a complete denial of keyboard access, forcing transactions to rely solely on mouse input. These deficiencies collectively render features like the shopping cart, delivery method selection, and checkout process impossible for blind customers.

Businesses operating similar digital sales platforms face substantial legal exposure if their online interfaces do not comply with federal and state accessibility mandates. This litigation underscores the imperative for all public accommodations to proactively integrate established web accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.1, into their digital infrastructure. Failure to provide an inclusive online experience risks not only legal challenges but also alienates a significant segment of the consumer base, preventing equitable access to goods and services for disabled individuals nationwide.

Case Q&A

What accessibility deficiencies were reported on the digital sales platform?

The complaint highlights numerous accessibility issues, including missing alternative text for graphics (like cookie boxes and nutritional facts), inaccessible drop-down menus, a lack of navigation links, insufficient prompting and labeling on forms, and the exclusive requirement of mouse interaction, rendering keyboard navigation impossible for screen reader users.

Who is bringing this class action, and which legal counsel is representing them?

Rasheta Bunting, a visually impaired individual, is the named plaintiff and class representative. She is being represented by the SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.

What broader implications does this lawsuit hold for other online businesses?

This case signifies the ongoing legal scrutiny over digital accessibility, emphasizing that online platforms are considered places of public accommodation under the AD

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Non-Profit Organization.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer