Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Pet Apparel Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed November 13, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text on ImagesKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Forms

Case Summary

Plaintiff Richard Paul Merrell, represented by Wilshire Law Firm, has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on November 13, 2020. The lawsuit targets an online pet apparel and accessories retailer, alleging its website is inaccessible to blind and visually impaired individuals using screen-reading software.

The complaint details numerous accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including the lack of alternative text for non-text elements, graphics, and images, which prevents screen readers from conveying descriptions. Other critical issues involve empty links, redundant links, linked images missing alt-text, forms without the same information and functionality as for sighted persons, failure to provide equivalent text when using scripts, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), and a keyboard operable user interface lacking a discernible focus indicator.

This legal action highlights significant risks for businesses operating online platforms under ADA Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, particularly those failing to meet established accessibility guidelines like WCAG 2.1. The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction to mandate website modifications, ensuring full and equal access for all users, and also requests statutory damages, underscoring the legal imperative for digital inclusivity.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online pet apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The online retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, empty and redundant links, forms without equal functionality, failure to provide equivalent text when using scripts, inaccessible PDFs, and keyboard navigation issues such as a lack of discernible focus indicators.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Richard Paul Merrell and is represented by Wilshire Law Firm.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online retailers regarding their compliance with ADA Title III and state accessibility laws, potentially leading to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys' fees for inaccessible websites.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Pet Apparel Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer