Methodology & Data Pipeline

The Texas Digital Accessibility Risk Index

1. The Data Source

TDARI connects directly to CourtListener, a public database of federal court dockets operated by the Free Law Project. We specifically isolate searches to federal district courts (e.g., Texas Western, New York Southern, Florida Southern, California Central) where Title III ADA digital accessibility claims are filed.

2. Keyword & Metadata Isolation

Because federal courts do not explicitly tag cases as "website accessibility" or "WCAG," TDARI relies on a two-step Boolean pipeline:

3. AI Forensics Engine

For every lawsuit identified, our system automatically downloads the original PDF complaint (via PACER RECAP). A headless Chromium instance combined with a specialized AI agent reads the legal document and extracts:

4. Deflagging Non-Digital Cases

Any case found to be purely "bricks and mortar" (e.g., missing wheelchair ramps, parking lot disputes) is automatically discarded from the database to maintain 100% digital focus.

5. Index Scoring Formula

The TDARI Risk Score (0-100) shown on state and case pages is calculated dynamically based on three factors:

Not legal advice. The TDARI Score is a statistical index of public court filing patterns. It does not predict lawsuit risk for any individual business. Always consult a qualified ADA attorney for compliance guidance. Full disclaimer →

6. Audit & Verification

All underlying data can be independently verified through CourtListener's public API and PACER's CM/ECF system. TDARI does not paywall any data, modify original court records, or apply proprietary ML classifiers. The scoring formula above is the complete, unabridged methodology.

← View the New York Report