Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed February 4, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

Missing Alt TextEmpty LinksKeyboard Navigation IssuesInaccessible PDFsScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff David Loaiza, represented by Wilshire Law Firm, filed a class action lawsuit on February 4, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The suit is brought against an online apparel retailer, alleging that its e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals, violating their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The complaint details various accessibility barriers encountered on the e-commerce website, including the lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, empty links, redundant links that cause unnecessary navigation, and linked images missing alt-text. Further allegations include issues with keyboard operability where the focus indicator is indiscernible, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), and elements whose name, role, and value cannot be programmatically determined, thus impeding screen reader users. These deficiencies prevent blind and visually impaired customers from fully accessing the website's products, services, and information.

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal exposure for online businesses, particularly those in the retail sector, whose websites fail to comply with established digital accessibility guidelines like WCAG 2.1. It underscores the necessity for companies to proactively ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to all users, including those with visual impairments, to prevent similar litigation and ensure compliance with ADA Title III.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

The online apparel retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including lacking alternative text for non-text elements and images, having empty links without descriptive text, redundant links, and linked images missing alt-text. Other issues include keyboard navigation failures (discernible focus indicator), inaccessible PDFs, and User Interface elements whose name and role cannot be programmatically determined.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by David Loaiza, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. He is represented by Wilshire Law Firm.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a significant legal risk for businesses, especially online retailers, if their websites are not designed to be fully accessible to visually impaired individuals. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 guidelines to avoid potential class action litigation and ensure equal access for all customers.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer