Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an industrial and construction products distributor

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed February 4, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureInaccessible FormsInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff David Loaiza, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, filed this ADA Title III accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on February 4, 2021, against an online industrial and construction products distributor. The complaint asserts that the defendant's e-commerce website is not fully accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals using screen reading software.

The lawsuit details numerous alleged WCAG violations, including missing alternative text for non-text elements and images, a lack of equivalent text for scripts, inaccessible forms, and an inability for screen reading software to fully interpret link purposes. Further issues cited include problems with keyboard operability, missing web page titles, content meaning conveyed solely by visual presentation, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs).

This legal action underscores the significant risk for other online industrial suppliers and e-commerce platforms that fail to adhere to digital accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1. Businesses operating websites that are not equally accessible to all users, particularly those with visual impairments, face potential ADA Title III and state-level civil rights act lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this industrial and construction products distributor accused of?

The online industrial and construction products distributor is accused of multiple WCAG violations, such as lacking alternative text for non-text elements, failing to provide equivalent text for scripts, offering inaccessible forms, and having links whose purpose cannot be programmatically determined. Other issues include poor keyboard operability and inaccessible PDFs.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff David Loaiza, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online industrial suppliers and e-commerce platforms that do not ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to similar ADA Title III lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an industrial and constru.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer