Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online home goods retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed February 18, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: BEVERLY HILLS TRIAL ATTORNEYS, P.C.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible FormsEmpty Links and Headings

Case Summary

Plaintiff Andrew Baracco, represented by Beverly Hills Trial Attorneys, P.C., filed an ADA website accessibility lawsuit on January 4, 2021, in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. The complaint targets an online home goods retailer, alleging that its e-commerce platform fails to provide equal access to visually-impaired individuals using screen-reading technology.

The lawsuit details several critical WCAG violations, including the pervasive lack of alt-text or text equivalents on graphics, inaccessible forms, and a general absence of adequate prompting and labeling. Furthermore, the platform allegedly denies full keyboard access, features numerous empty links and headings, and presents content that is neither fully readable nor navigable by screen readers. These identified barriers prevent blind and visually-impaired customers from independently accessing product information, discounts, and services offered.

This case underscores the significant legal exposure for e-commerce platforms and online retailers that do not prioritize digital accessibility. Businesses offering goods and services online must ensure their websites comply with ADA Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act to avoid similar litigation, which can result in demands for substantial compensatory damages, injunctive relief requiring costly remediations, and attorneys' fees.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online home goods retailer accused of?

The online home goods retailer is accused of several WCAG violations, including a lack of alt-text on graphics, inaccessible forms, inadequate prompting and labeling, denial of keyboard access, empty links and headings, inability to complete tasks with screen readers, and content that is not fully readable or navigable by screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Andrew Baracco, and he is represented by Beverly Hills Trial Attorneys, P.C.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar e-commerce platforms, as they may face lawsuits under ADA Title III and state civil rights acts for inaccessible websites, potentially leading to injunctions, statutory damages, and legal fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online home goods reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer