Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Jewelry Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed February 23, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Brett DeSalvo, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on February 23, 2021. The complaint targets an online jewelry retailer, alleging that its digital platform is inaccessible to blind and visually impaired individuals, thereby violating their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The lawsuit details multiple accessibility barriers on the defendant's website, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, empty links without descriptive text, and redundant links. Further alleged violations include web pages lacking descriptive titles, forms that do not provide equal functionality for visually impaired users, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), and user interface elements whose name and role cannot be programmatically determined, hindering screen reader compatibility.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses that operate e-commerce websites or digital platforms without adhering to established accessibility guidelines such as WCAG 2.1. Companies in the retail sector, particularly those with an online presence, face potential lawsuits if their digital services are not fully and equally accessible to individuals with disabilities, leading to demands for injunctive relief and statutory damages.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry retailer accused of?

The online jewelry retailer is accused of lacking alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, having empty links, redundant links, web pages without descriptive titles, forms not equally functional for visually impaired users, inaccessible PDFs, and user interface elements that cannot be programmatically determined.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Brett DeSalvo filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for similar businesses operating online platforms, demonstrating the necessity for all digital services to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 guidelines to avoid lawsuits and ensure accessibility for all users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Jewelry Retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer