Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Luxury Lingerie Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed April 19, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation IssuesInaccessible PDFsNon-descriptive Links

Case Summary

Portia Mason, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on April 19, 2021, against an online luxury lingerie retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is not fully and equally accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals who rely on screen reading software.

The lawsuit details multiple accessibility barriers, including a pervasive lack of alternative text for images and non-text elements, which prevents screen readers from vocalizing descriptions. Other critical issues cited are empty and redundant links, hindering keyboard navigation, and the presence of inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs). Furthermore, the complaint highlights problems with user interface elements not being programmatically determined, non-descriptive link text, and content not being conveyed adequately without visual presentation.

This action underscores the legal imperative for e-commerce websites to comply with established accessibility guidelines like WCAG 2.1. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to mandate that the e-commerce website become fully accessible, demonstrating the significant legal exposure for any online business whose digital platforms fail to provide equal access to all users under the Americans with Disabilities Act and state-level civil rights acts.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury lingerie retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of several WCAG violations, including a lack of alternative text for images and non-text elements, empty and redundant links, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), issues with keyboard navigation, and user interface elements not being programmatically determined.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Portia Mason, and she is represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for online businesses, emphasizing the need for their websites to be fully accessible to disabled users. Non-compliance with WCAG 2.1 guidelines can lead to lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act and similar state laws, potentially resulting in mandatory injunctive relief and statutory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Luxury Lingerie.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer