Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Supermarket Chain

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed April 29, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityColor Contrast Issues

Case Summary

Plaintiff Andres Gomez has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Central District of California, on April 29, 2021, against an online supermarket chain. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website fails to provide full and equal access to visually impaired individuals, constituting discrimination under ADA Title III and the Unruh Act.

The lawsuit specifies numerous WCAG violations, including images lacking functional text equivalents, links/buttons unreadable by screen readers, videos/animations playing for extended periods without pause controls, reliance on pointing-device-specific event handlers, improper use of CSS for layout impacting meaning, duplicate element IDs, HTML form controls missing accessible names, frame elements lacking title attributes, malformed attributes, links without visual identification or clear purpose, ambiguous link text, missing skip link target anchors, obscured focus outlines, new windows opening without warning, and a lack of proper heading structure and sufficient color contrast.

This litigation highlights significant legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites or digital platforms in the retail industry. Companies that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 AA standards, by not making their digital assets accessible to disabled users, face potential exposure to damages, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online supermarket accused of?

The lawsuit alleges images lack functional text equivalents, links/buttons are unreadable by screen readers, videos/animations play too long without pause, it relies on pointing-device-specific event handlers, CSS is misused for layout, there are duplicate element IDs, HTML form controls lack accessible names, frame elements lack title attributes, attributes lack spaces, links are not visually identified or have ambiguous text, skip links lack target anchors, focus outlines are obscured, new windows open without warning, pages lack heading elements, and there are color contrast issues.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Andres Gomez, and the plaintiff is represented by MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses with inaccessible websites, as it can lead to lawsuits seeking damages, injunctive relief, and recovery of attorney's fees and costs under ADA Title III and state laws.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Supermarket Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer