Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Luxury Fashion Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed May 3, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextEmpty LinksKeyboard AccessibilityInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Salem Rosales, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, filed a class action lawsuit against an online luxury fashion retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on May 03, 2021. The complaint alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The complaint details several specific WCAG violations, including the lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links leading to the same URL, and linked images missing alt-text. Further accessibility barriers cited include forms not equally functional for sighted and visually impaired persons, unresizable text, enforced time limits without user control, missing web page titles, unclear link purposes, non-discernible keyboard focus indicators, undetermined default human language for web pages, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs).

This action underscores the legal imperative for online luxury fashion retailers and similar e-commerce websites to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to visually impaired users. Failure to address these accessibility barriers exposes businesses to significant legal risks, including demands for permanent injunctions to enforce WCAG compliance, and statutory damages for discriminatory practices, as sought by the plaintiff and the proposed class.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury fashion retailer accused of?

The online luxury fashion retailer is accused of lacking alternative text for images, having empty links, using redundant links, containing linked images without alt-text, forms lacking equal functionality, unresizable text, enforced time limits, missing page titles, unclear link purposes, non-discernible keyboard focus indicators, and inaccessible PDFs.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Salem Rosales filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses of facing class action lawsuits under ADA Title III and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, potentially leading to court-ordered injunctive relief to remediate website accessibility barriers and liability for statutory damages if their digital platforms are not independently usable by visually impaired individuals.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Luxury Fashion Ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer