Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Hotel & Resort Operator

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed May 5, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureColor Contrast IssuesAmbiguous Link Text

Case Summary

Andres Gomez has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Central District of California, on May 5, 2021, against a hotel and resort operator. The plaintiff, who is legally blind, alleges that the defendant's website, which offers services related to a brick-and-mortar hotel, is inaccessible to individuals using screen-reader software.

Plaintiff Andres Gomez, represented by MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C., identifies numerous accessibility barriers on the defendant's website. These include screen reader failures to read main menu graphic icons and other links, placeholder alternative text, focusable elements hidden by child element roles, empty button elements lacking accessible names, and bad values in hidden attributes. Further issues involve unreadable pages when stylesheets are off due to CSS positioning, unskippable long CSS animations, duplicate IDs, blank attribute tags, improperly closed tags, missing frame title attributes, and ambiguous link text. Additionally, the website exhibits missing visual labels for links and controls, insufficient text and background color contrast, inadequate contrast for user interface controls, empty page headings, incomplete color attributes, obscured focus outlines, new windows opening without warning, and unskippable CSS animations or transitions.

This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by online businesses, particularly those in the hospitality sector, if their digital platforms fail to comply with ADA Title III and related state statutes. Companies operating websites must ensure full and equal access for all users, including those with visual impairments, to avoid potential litigation, demands for injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys' fees and costs, as sought by the plaintiff in this case.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this hotel and resort operator accused of?

The lawsuit alleges screen reader incompatibility, placeholder alternative text, empty buttons lacking accessible names, focusable elements hidden by child roles, unreadable pages with stylesheets off due to CSS positioning, unskippable CSS animations, duplicate IDs, blank attribute tags, improperly closed tags, missing frame title attributes, ambiguous link text, missing visual labels for controls, insufficient text and background color contrast, inadequate UI control contrast, empty page headings, incomplete color attributes, obscured focus outlines, and new windows opening without warning.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, represented by MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses in the hospitality sector whose websites may not comply with ADA Title III guidelines, potentially leading to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Hotel & Resort Operator. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer