Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Restaurant Platform

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed June 16, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible NamesEmpty HeadingsFocus Indicator IssuesLow Contrast UI Controls

Case Summary

Andres Gomez, represented by MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C., filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online restaurant platform in the United States District Court, Central District of California, on June 16, 2021. The plaintiff, a visually impaired individual, alleges that the defendant's website failed to provide full and equal access, thereby denying him the ability to independently use the platform's services.

The complaint details numerous WCAG violations, including screen reader failures to read information links, graphics, and the website's logo. Additional barriers cited are blank document titles, links with non-text content lacking accessible names, HTML form controls without accessible names, empty headings, the absence of a site map or table of contents, CSS outline/border styles obscuring focus outlines, user interface controls with insufficient contrast ratio, and the use of CSS animations/transitions without an option to turn them off.

This action underscores the significant legal liability for businesses, particularly those operating online restaurant platforms, that do not ensure their digital properties are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to comply with established web accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0 AA, can result in demands for injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorney's fees under the Americans with Disabilities Act and state-level civil rights laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant platform accused of?

The online restaurant platform is accused of screen reader failures to read information links, graphics, and the logo; blank document titles; links with only non-text content; inaccessible HTML form controls; empty headings; no site map; obscured focus outlines; poor contrast ratio for user interface controls; and CSS animations/transitions without an off option.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, and he is represented by MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for online businesses, such as those operating restaurant websites, if their digital platforms are not accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees under the AD

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Restaurant Plat.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer