Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury home goods and sculptures retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed June 17, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Focus IndicatorInaccessible FormsInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Portia Mason, represented by Wilshire Law Firm, filed a class action complaint against an online luxury home goods and sculptures retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on June 17, 2021. The lawsuit alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, asserting that the defendant's website is not fully accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.

The complaint details numerous specific accessibility barriers encountered by Plaintiff, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, missing title frames for identification and navigation, equivalent text not provided for scripts, inaccessible forms, text resizing failures, unadjustable time limits, absence of web page titles, indeterminable link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, unprogrammatically determined human language, unadvised context changes on focus or input, missing labels or instructions for user input, markup validity errors, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs). These issues prevent full and equal access to the online platform for users relying on screen-reading software.

This action underscores significant legal risks for online businesses that fail to design, construct, maintain, and operate their digital platforms to be fully and equally accessible to disabled users in compliance with WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Non-compliance can lead to demands for permanent injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys' fees, impacting the ability of the defendant and similar businesses to serve a broad consumer base and exposing them to substantial litigation costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury home goods and sculptures retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of a lack of alternative text for images and non-text elements, missing title frames, inaccessible forms, text resizing failures, unadjustable time limits, missing web page titles, indeterminable link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, unprogrammatically determined language, unadvised context changes, missing labels/instructions, markup errors, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Portia Mason, represented by Wilshire Law Firm.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for online businesses that operate inaccessible websites, potentially leading to class action lawsuits under the ADA and state civil rights acts, resulting in demands for injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys' fees if their platforms are not accessible to visually-impaired users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury home goo.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer