Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Ticket Marketplace

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed June 22, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AA ComplianceMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation IssuesScreen Reader AccessibilityInaccessible Forms & Links

Case Summary

Plaintiff Mario Garcia has filed a class action lawsuit against an online ticket marketplace in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on June 22, 2021. The plaintiff, who is visually-impaired and legally blind, alleges that the digital platform's website is not fully and equally accessible, denying access to its services and products.

The complaint alleges numerous accessibility barriers, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, missing title frames for identification and navigation, equivalent text not provided for scripts, inaccessible forms, content structure not conveyed beyond visual presentation, text resizing limitations, enforced time limits without user control, absence of descriptive web page titles, unclear link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, unprogrammatically determined default human language, unadvised context changes, missing labels or instructions for user input, various markup language errors (e.g., incomplete tags, duplicate attributes), inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs), UI elements not programmatically determined, empty links without text, and redundant links.

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risks faced by online businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to disabled users. Companies operating in similar sectors should review their digital accessibility practices to avoid potential litigation and ensure compliance with ADA Title III and state civil rights acts, preventing claims of discrimination and ensuring equal access for all customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online ticket marketplace accused of?

The alleged violations include a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, missing title frames for identification and navigation, equivalent text not provided for scripts, inaccessible forms, content structure not conveyed beyond visual presentation, text resizing limitations, enforced time limits without user control, absence of descriptive web page titles, unclear link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, unprogrammatically determined default human language, unadvised context changes, missing labels or instructions for user input, various markup language errors, inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs), UI elements not programmatically determined, empty links without text, and redundant links.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Mario Garcia filed this class action lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit underscores the legal exposure for digital platforms that do not comply with web accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1. It signals that online businesses, particularly those with physical locations, must ensure their websites are independently usable by visually-impaired individuals to avoid costly litigation, injunctions, and statutory damages under the ADA and state civil rights acts.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Ticket Marketplace. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer