Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant and Pharmacy Website

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed June 23, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Focus Indicator IssuesInaccessible FormsUnclear Link Purpose

Case Summary

Plaintiff Mario Garcia, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated persons, filed a class action complaint against an online restaurant and pharmacy in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on June 23, 2021. The plaintiff, a visually-impaired and legally blind individual who relies on screen-reading software, alleges that the website of the online restaurant and pharmacy is not fully accessible, thereby denying equal access to its goods and services.

The complaint details several alleged WCAG violations, including: lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images; empty links and redundant links causing navigation confusion; missing title frames for identification; absence of equivalent text when using scripts; forms lacking the same information and functionality as for sighted persons; content information not conveyed solely by visual presentation; text resizing issues; unadjustable time limits; missing web page titles; unclear link purposes; indiscernible keyboard focus indicators; non-programmatically determined human language; unexpected context changes upon component focus or setting changes; missing labels or instructions for user input; markup language errors; inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs); and user interface elements lacking programmatically determined name, role, or settable items.

This action highlights the significant legal risks for online service providers, particularly those in the restaurant and pharmacy industries, that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating websites that do not comply with established accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.1, may face similar class action lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate accessibility barriers, and potential statutory damages under federal and state disability laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant and pharmacy accused of?

The online restaurant and pharmacy is accused of lacking alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, having empty links and redundant links, missing title frames, absence of equivalent text for scripts, inaccessible forms, text resizing issues, unadjustable time limits, missing web page titles, unclear link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, markup language errors, inaccessible PDFs, and various other UI element accessibility issues.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Mario Garcia, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and is represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create for similar businesses?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses, particularly those in the online restaurant and pharmacy sector, that operate inaccessible websites. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and state civil rights acts can lead to class action lawsuits, demands for permanent injunctions to implement accessibility, and statutory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant and Pharmacy W.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer