ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Restaurant
Plaintiff's Firm: MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
Case Summary
Plaintiff Andres Gomez, represented by MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C., filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online restaurant in the United States District Court, Central District of California, on July 9, 2021. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired and uses screen-reader software, alleges that the restaurant's website is inaccessible, thereby denying him full and equal access to its goods and services.
The complaint details numerous WCAG violations, including screen reader inaccessibility to main menu graphic links and promotions, non-keyboard accessible clickable controls, blank document titles, links with non-text content lacking accessible names, PDF figures/images without alternative text, HTML form controls lacking accessible names, untagged PDFs, improper ARIA attribute usage, missing PDF/UA identifiers, visual labels not matching accessible names, empty button elements, non-semantic coding, disabled text zooming, poor text/background contrast, and the absence of a site map.
This legal action underscores the critical need for online businesses, such as an online restaurant, to ensure their digital platforms comply with established accessibility standards like WCAG 2.0 AA. Failure to do so exposes businesses to significant legal risks, including demands for injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorney fees, emphasizing the importance of proactively addressing digital accessibility barriers to avoid litigation and ensure inclusivity for all users.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant accused of?
The online restaurant's website is alleged to have issues where screen readers cannot access graphic links or read promotions, clickable controls are not keyboard accessible, document titles are blank, links lack accessible names, PDF images miss alternative text, HTML form controls have no accessible names, PDFs are untagged, ARIA attributes are improperly implemented, PDF/UA identifiers are missing, visual labels don't match accessible names, button elements are empty, coding is non-semantic, text zooming is disabled, text and background colors lack proper contrast, and there is no site map.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, represented by MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
What legal risk does this create?
This case highlights that online businesses face legal exposure under ADA Title III for inaccessible websites. Non-compliance with WCAG 2.0 AA standards can lead to lawsuits demanding injunctive relief, damages, and attorney fees, emphasizing the necessity of digital accessibility for all users.