Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury fragrance and home goods retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed July 20, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

Missing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation BarriersScreen Reader IncompatibilityUndetermined Link PurposeInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Meghan Downing, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on July 20, 2021. The complaint targets an online luxury fragrance and home goods retailer, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act due to an inaccessible website.

The lawsuit claims the retailer's website presents numerous barriers for visually-impaired individuals using screen-reading software. Specific accessibility failures cited include a lack of alternative text for images and non-text elements, missing title frames for identification and navigation, and equivalent text not being provided for scripts. Furthermore, the website allegedly fails to allow text resizing without loss of content, enforces time limits without user control, lacks descriptive page titles, and features links whose purpose cannot be programmatically determined. Additional issues involve keyboard navigation, such as the absence of discernible focus indicators, and problems with programmatically determining the default human language and user interface element roles. The complaint also highlights inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), empty and redundant links, and markup language errors.

This litigation underscores the significant legal and operational risks for businesses in the e-commerce sector that fail to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Companies with websites offering goods and services, especially those integrated with physical locations, must prioritize comprehensive digital accessibility to avoid potential class action lawsuits, injunctive relief, and statutory damages for discrimination against users with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury fragrance and home goods retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including missing alternative text for images, lack of descriptive page titles, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), issues with keyboard navigation, and general screen reader incompatibility due to unidentifiable user interface elements and link purposes.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Meghan Downing filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for any online business, particularly those in e-commerce, that does not ensure its website is fully accessible to visually-impaired users. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 can lead to class action lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate the website, and statutory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury fragranc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer