ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Jewelry and Accessories Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM
Case Summary
Portia Mason, represented by Wilshire Law Firm, PLC, filed a lawsuit against an online jewelry and accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on July 30, 2021. The plaintiff, a visually-impaired individual, alleges that the e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind users relying on screen-reading software.
The complaint details numerous accessibility barriers, including the lack of alternative text for graphics and images, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links leading to the same URL, and linked images missing alt-text. These issues, alongside the absence of discernible keyboard focus indicators and proper page titles, are alleged to violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, denying equal access to the defendant's products and services.
This litigation highlights the critical legal and reputational risks for online businesses that fail to maintain a digitally accessible platform in compliance with WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Companies operating similar e-commerce websites should proactively audit their digital properties to remediate such barriers, preventing potential federal lawsuits, injunctive relief demands, and statutory damages.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry and accessories retailer accused of?
The retailer is accused of lacking alternative text on images and non-text elements, having empty and undescriptive links, redundant links, keyboard focus indicator issues, and missing page titles.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Portia Mason filed this lawsuit, represented by Wilshire Law Firm.
What legal risk does this create?
This case underscores the significant legal risk for online businesses that do not ensure their websites are accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to costly lawsuits under the ADA and state civil rights acts, as well as mandatory website remediation.