Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Tile and Stone Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed August 9, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard OperabilityInaccessible PDFsUnclear Link Purpose

Case Summary

Thuy Thanh Alonzo has filed a lawsuit against an online tile and stone retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, on August 09, 2021. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant's website fails to comply with accessibility standards, denying visually impaired individuals equal access to its services and products.

The complaint details numerous WCAG violations on the e-commerce website, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, absence of title frames with text for navigation, and missing equivalent text for scripts. Further barriers include forms not equally functional for sighted and visually impaired users, content meaning not conveyed beyond visual presentation, text not resizable without content loss, and issues with time limits. The website also reportedly lacks discernible keyboard focus indicators, proper link context, programmatically determined human language, and suffers from markup language errors, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), empty links, and redundant links.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers and similar businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Thuy Thanh Alonzo, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, seeks a permanent injunction and statutory damages, underscoring the importance of adhering to WCAG 2.1 guidelines to avoid violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online tile and stone retailer accused of?

The online tile and stone retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, absence of title frames for navigation, missing equivalent text for scripts, forms not equally functional for all users, content not conveyed beyond visual presentation, text not resizable, web pages lacking descriptive titles, unclear link purposes, absence of discernible keyboard focus indicators, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Thuy Thanh Alonzo filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses operating websites that are not accessible to visually impaired individuals, as they may face lawsuits under ADA Title III and state civil rights acts, potentially resulting in court orders for website modifications and statutory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Tile and Stone .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer