Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Coffee Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed August 11, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation IssuesInaccessible FormsPDF Accessibility

Case Summary

Thuy Thanh Alonzo, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, has filed a class action lawsuit against an online coffee retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 11, 2021. The complaint alleges that the retailer's website is not fully and equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, thereby violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The lawsuit specifically details numerous accessibility barriers encountered on the e-commerce website. These violations include a pervasive lack of alternative text for non-text elements, which prevents screen-readers from describing images, and issues with keyboard navigation where the focus indicator is not discernible. Other critical barriers cited are inaccessible forms for user input, content whose meaning is not conveyed without visual presentation, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDF) files that prevent screen-reading software from rendering content into text.

This action underscores the significant legal exposure for online businesses, especially those with integrated physical locations, that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies with similar business models risk facing class action litigation, demands for injunctive relief requiring costly website remediation, and potential statutory damages under both federal and state accessibility laws, highlighting the imperative for proactive WCAG compliance.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online coffee retailer accused of?

The online coffee retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements, issues with keyboard operability where the focus indicator is not discernible, inaccessible forms, content meaning not conveyed without visual presentation, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDF) files.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Thuy Thanh Alonzo filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the significant legal risk for online businesses, particularly those operating with physical locations, if their websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and state civil rights acts can lead to class action lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate the website, and statutory damages, emphasizing the need for comprehensive digital accessibility.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Coffee Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer