ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online furniture retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM
Case Summary
Plaintiff Portia Mason, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, initiated a class action lawsuit against an online furniture retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 16, 2021.
The complaint alleges numerous violations of WCAG 2.1 guidelines, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, missing title frames for identification and navigation, inadequate text equivalents when using scripts, and inaccessible forms. Further barriers include issues with text resizing without loss of content, enforced time limits, web pages lacking descriptive titles, and unclear link purposes. The lawsuit also identifies non-discernible keyboard focus indicators, undetermined default human language, unexpected context changes upon focus or setting alterations, absence of labels or instructions for user input, problematic markup language (incomplete tags, non-nested elements, duplicate attributes), inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), and unprogrammatically determined user interface elements, all of which hinder screen reader compatibility.
This litigation underscores the ongoing legal exposure for businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities, especially those who rely on assistive technologies. Such failures can result in class action lawsuits, demands for costly injunctive relief to rectify accessibility barriers, and statutory damages under relevant civil rights acts, establishing a precedent for similar online retailers.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online furniture retailer accused of?
The online furniture retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including missing alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, inadequate title frames and page titles, inaccessible forms, text resizing issues, enforced time limits, unclear link purposes, and non-discernible keyboard focus indicators. The complaint also cites issues with markup language, inaccessible PDFs, and unprogrammatically determined user interface elements, all hindering screen reader compatibility.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Portia Mason, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, filed this lawsuit through the law firm WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.
What legal risk does this create?
This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risk for businesses operating websites that are not fully accessible to disabled users, particularly those who rely on screen-reading software. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines can lead to class action litigation, demands for injunctive relief to remediate inaccessible platforms, and statutory damages under state civil rights acts.