Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Boutique

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed August 16, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

Missing Alternative TextKeyboard Focus Indicator FailureInaccessible PDFsMissing Page TitlesMissing Form Labels/Instructions

Case Summary

Plaintiff Portia Mason, represented by Wilshire Law Firm, has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 16, 2021, alleging that an online boutique's website is inaccessible to visually impaired users. The complaint asserts violations under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, claiming denial of full and equal access to the website's goods and services.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including the lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links, and linked images missing alt-text. Further allegations include text that cannot be resized, content with enforced time limits, web pages lacking descriptive titles, unclear link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, undefined default human language, and elements causing unexpected context changes. Issues with missing labels/instructions, improperly structured markup, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs) are also cited.

This action highlights significant legal risks for e-commerce websites and other online businesses that fail to design and maintain their digital platforms in compliance with ADA Title III and the Unruh Civil Rights Act. Non-compliance could lead to permanent injunctions requiring substantial website modifications, as well as statutory damages and attorney's fees, serving as a cautionary tale for businesses to proactively ensure their digital accessibility.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

The online apparel retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including lack of alternative text, empty links, redundant links, linked images missing alt-text, text not resizable, content with enforced time limits, web pages lacking descriptive titles, unclear link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, undefined default human language, context changes without warning, missing labels/instructions, improper markup, and inaccessible PDFs.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm represents the plaintiff?

Plaintiff Portia Mason filed this lawsuit, and she is represented by Wilshire Law Firm.

What legal risk does this create for similar businesses?

This lawsuit creates a legal risk for similar online businesses that their websites may be found in violation of ADA Title III and the Unruh Civil Rights Act if they do not provide full and equal access to visually impaired individuals, potentially leading to injunctive relief and statutory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Boutique. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer