Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online furniture retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed August 26, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

Missing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation IssuesScreen Reader IncompatibilityForm Accessibility BarriersInaccessible PDFs and Markup Errors

Case Summary

Plaintiff Portia Mason has filed a class action lawsuit against an online furniture retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 26, 2021. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website, an online platform for furniture sales and services, is not fully and equally accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals, constituting violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The lawsuit specifically details numerous accessibility barriers including the lack of alternative text for non-text elements, missing title frames with text for identification and navigation, equivalent text not provided for scripts, forms without full functionality for sighted persons, information about content meaning and structure not conveyed visually, text that cannot be resized, enforced time limits without user control, web pages lacking descriptive titles, unclear link purposes, a keyboard-operable user interface without a discernible focus indicator, undetermined default human language, components initiating context changes upon focus, automatic context changes without user advisement, missing labels or instructions for user input, invalid or non-semantic markup, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), and user interface elements that are not programmatically determinable or settable.

This litigation highlights the critical legal risks faced by businesses operating e-commerce websites and digital platforms that fail to adhere to established web content accessibility guidelines. Companies in the furniture retail sector and other industries offering goods and services online via integrated physical and digital operations must ensure their websites are independently usable by individuals with disabilities to avoid similar lawsuits and ensure compliance with federal and state accessibility laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online furniture retailer accused of?

The online furniture retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including lack of alternative text, missing title frames, equivalent text not provided for scripts, inaccessible forms, inability to resize text, enforced time limits, missing page titles, unclear link purposes, lack of keyboard focus indicators, undetermined default human language, unadvised context changes, missing input labels, invalid markup, inaccessible PDFs, and unprogrammatically determinable UI elements.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Portia Mason, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses, particularly those in the e-commerce sector, demonstrating the necessity of ensuring their websites and digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities to comply with ADA Title III and state civil rights laws.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online furniture retai.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer