ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Self-Storage Provider
Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM
Case Summary
Portia Mason has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 26, 2021, against an online self-storage provider. Ms. Mason, a visually impaired and legally blind individual, alleges that the company's website is inaccessible to screen-reading software, thereby denying her and other blind users equal access to its products and services, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.
The complaint details several specific accessibility barriers encountered on the defendant's website, including: a lack of alternative text for graphics and images; empty links that provide no functional description to screen-reader users; redundant links leading to unnecessary navigation; and linked images missing alt-text. Furthermore, the website allegedly suffers from issues such as a keyboard operable user interface lacking a discernible focus indicator, and a failure to programmatically determine the default human language of web pages, among other technical deficiencies that impede full accessibility.
This legal action underscores the critical need for online businesses to ensure their digital platforms comply with web accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1. Similar businesses face significant legal exposure, including demands for permanent injunctions, statutory damages, and attorneys' fees, if their websites are not designed and maintained to be fully and equally accessible to all users, including those with visual impairments who rely on assistive technologies.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online self-storage provider accused of?
The lawsuit alleges lack of alternative text for graphics and images; empty links without descriptive text; redundant links; linked images missing alt-text; and a keyboard operable user interface lacking a discernible focus indicator.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Plaintiff Portia Mason filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.
What legal risk does this create?
This case demonstrates the legal exposure for online businesses that do not ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III and state civil rights acts, demanding injunctive relief and financial penalties.