ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Furniture Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM
Case Summary
Plaintiff Thuy Thanh Alonzo has filed a class action lawsuit against an online furniture retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 27, 2021. The complaint alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is not fully and equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.
The lawsuit details numerous accessibility barriers, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, missing text in title frames for identification and navigation, no equivalent text for scripts, inaccessible forms, and content meaning not conveyed visually. Other alleged violations include text that cannot be resized without content loss, enforced time limits preventing user extension, web pages lacking descriptive titles, link purposes not determinable from text alone, keyboard operable user interfaces without discernible focus indicators, undeclared default human language, unadvised context changes upon component focus, empty and redundant links, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDF) files.
This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risks for e-commerce platforms and other online businesses that fail to ensure their digital properties are fully accessible to disabled users. Non-compliance can lead to ADA Title III and Unruh Civil Rights Act violations, resulting in demands for injunctive relief, statutory damages, attorney’s fees, and significant operational changes to achieve WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online furniture retailer accused of?
The retailer is accused of lacking alternative text for non-text elements and images, missing text in title frames, failing to provide equivalent text for scripts, offering inaccessible forms, and not conveying content meaning visually. Other violations include enforced time limits, web pages without descriptive titles, ambiguous link purposes, indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, undeclared human language, unadvised context changes upon focus, empty and redundant links, and inaccessible PDFs.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by Thuy Thanh Alonzo, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a significant legal risk for online businesses, highlighting the potential for class action lawsuits under ADA Title III and similar state laws if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users. Non-compliance can lead to court-ordered injunctive relief, substantial statutory damages, and demands for comprehensive accessibility overhauls to meet standards like WCAG 2.1.