Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Consignment Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed September 2, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Operability IssuesInaccessible PDFsMissing Page Titles

Case Summary

Meghan Downing has filed a class action lawsuit against an online consignment retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on September 2, 2021. The lawsuit alleges that the retailer's website is inaccessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, seeking to secure redress for these digital accessibility barriers.

The complaint details numerous Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, missing title frames for identification and navigation, and an absence of equivalent text for scripts. Further accessibility barriers cited involve forms not having the same information and functionality as for sighted users, content structure not conveyed visually, text that cannot be resized without assistive technology, and enforcement of time limits without user control. Additional issues encompass web pages lacking descriptive titles, purposes of links being undeterminable from text or context, keyboard operable user interfaces without discernible focus indicators, and programmatically undetermined default human languages. The website also reportedly initiates context changes when components receive focus or settings are altered without user advisement, lacks labels or instructions for user input, contains markup language errors, and features inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs). Finally, user interface elements' names and roles are not programmatically determined, items cannot be set by users, and changes are not notified to user agents.

This legal action underscores the critical need for online businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce websites integrated with physical locations, to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Failure to implement comprehensive accessibility measures can lead to significant litigation, demands for injunctive relief requiring costly website modifications, and statutory damages for each accessibility barrier encountered by disabled users, creating substantial legal and financial risks for non-compliant entities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online consignment retailer accused of?

The online consignment retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations including lack of alternative text for images and non-text elements, missing title frames, absence of equivalent text for scripts, inaccessible forms, text resizing limitations, enforced time limits, missing web page titles, unclear link purposes, keyboard operability issues, undetermined default human language, unadvised context changes, missing input labels, markup language errors, and inaccessible PDFs.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Meghan Downing filed this lawsuit. The plaintiff is represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for online businesses that fail to make their websites accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Non-compliance can result in demands for injunctive relief, mandatory website modifications, and statutory damages, creating substantial legal and financial exposure.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Consignment Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer